<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>blog.spathis.com &#187; politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.spathis.com/taxonomy/categories/politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.spathis.com</link>
	<description>Random musings &#038; skepsis...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 04:03:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>WOW! WOW! WOW!</title>
		<link>http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2008/11/05/wow-wow-wow/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2008/11/05/wow-wow-wow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 05:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Constantine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2008/11/05/wow-wow-wow/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Enough said!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/05/us/politics/05campaign.html?_r=1&#038;hp&#038;oref=slogin">Enough said!</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2008/11/05/wow-wow-wow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Colin Powell devastates McCain&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2008/10/20/colin-powell-devastates-mccain/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2008/10/20/colin-powell-devastates-mccain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 12:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Constantine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[currentaffairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2008/10/20/colin-powell-devastates-mccain/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The presidential race is certainly heating up. This youtube clip is a devastating indictment of McCain by one of my favorite statesmen, Colin Powell. It is heartening to see that Colin Powell actually gives voice to the &#8220;disenfranchised&#8221; Republican. The Republican party had an opportunity to remake itself in this election cycle, it chose not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/243gXtXtEwc&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/243gXtXtEwc&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
<p>The presidential race is certainly heating up. This youtube clip is a devastating indictment of McCain by one of my favorite statesmen, Colin Powell. It is heartening to see that Colin Powell actually gives voice to the &#8220;disenfranchised&#8221; Republican. The Republican party had an opportunity to remake itself in this election cycle, it chose not to. I suspect devastating losses in November as a result.</p>
<p>Colin Powell, his words are wise, enjoy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2008/10/20/colin-powell-devastates-mccain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s first move&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2008/06/05/obamas-first-move/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2008/06/05/obamas-first-move/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 16:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Constantine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2008/06/05/obamas-first-move/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Having just clinched the DNC nomination one of Obama&#8217;s first moves: DNC will no longer take lobbyist, PAC money This is going to be one hell of a race. I wonder how and if the Republicans will respond.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having just clinched the DNC nomination one of Obama&#8217;s first moves:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.newsobserver.com/1573/story/1097155.html">DNC will no longer take lobbyist, PAC money</a></p>
<p>This is going to be one hell of a race. I wonder how and if the Republicans will respond.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2008/06/05/obamas-first-move/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don Boudreaux</title>
		<link>http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2008/03/28/don-boudreaux/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2008/03/28/don-boudreaux/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 14:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Constantine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[currentaffairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2008/03/28/don-boudreaux/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don Boudreaux, Chairman of the Department of Economics at George Mason University, occasionally comes up with some great lines, his latest: &#8220;Almost all that any politician says on any topic other than political strategy should be treated with even less respect than would be accorded a professional circus-clown&#8217;s speculations about string theory.&#8221; You have to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don Boudreaux, Chairman of the Department of Economics at George Mason University, occasionally comes up with some great lines, <a href="http://cafehayek.typepad.com/hayek/2008/03/the-dark-art.html">his latest</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p><i>&#8220;Almost all that any politician says on any topic other than political strategy should be treated with even less respect than would be accorded a professional circus-clown&#8217;s speculations about string theory.&#8221;</i> </p></blockquote>
<p>You have to love it when someone gets to the heart of an issue. The rest of the post is pretty good as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2008/03/28/don-boudreaux/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Its Over &#8211; Dick Morris&#8230;.</title>
		<link>http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2008/03/09/its-over-dick-morris/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2008/03/09/its-over-dick-morris/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 01:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Constantine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2008/03/09/its-over-dick-morris/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Insightful assessment of the current situation with the Democrats by Dick Morris in an article at TheHill.com. Morris lays out a unique perspective that I have not heard before. One which is very different than what many of the other pundits are saying. Morris hammers home the point that a fight for the nomination all [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>    Insightful assessment of the current situation with the Democrats by <a href="http://thehill.com/dick-morris/its-over-2008-03-06.html">Dick Morris in an article at TheHill.com</a>. Morris lays out a unique perspective that I have not heard before. One which is very different than what many of the other pundits are saying. </p>
<p>    Morris hammers home the point that a fight for the nomination all the way to the Democratic Convention would serve to steal the thunder of McCain. He (McCain) would be drowned out of the front page by the shenanigans of the Democratic candidates and would be unable to really focus on either potential Democratic candidate, a very interesting and astute observation. </p>
<p>    The fear is that Hilary&#8217;s attacks on Obama would serve to somehow damage him going into the full Presidential campaign. According to Morris, Hilary has no shot at really hurting Obama &#038; the DNC Delegates would be absolutely crazy to nominate her. If the Democratic nominee is up for grabs all the way to the convention &#038; Obama was crowned at the convention there would be a massive upsurge in his popularity (indeed Morris believes an insurmountable upsurge). That upswing could last the remaining nine weeks to the actual election and Obama could walk away with all the marbles. </p>
<p>Fascinating analysis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2008/03/09/its-over-dick-morris/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Barack Obama &amp; Marc Andreessen</title>
		<link>http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2008/03/03/barack-obama-marc-andreessen/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2008/03/03/barack-obama-marc-andreessen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 16:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Constantine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[currentaffairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2008/03/03/barack-obama-marc-andreessen/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marc Andreesen is turning out to be one of my favorite bloggers. He is always publishing witty insights both in and out of the tech &#038; business world. He has a great post today on his meeting with Barack Obama in 2007. If you weren&#8217;t an Obama supporter beforehand this post may very well make [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>	Marc Andreesen is turning out to be one of my favorite bloggers. He is always publishing witty insights both in and out of the tech &#038; business world. He has a <a href="http://blog.pmarca.com/2008/03/an-hour-and-a-h.html">great post today on his meeting with Barack Obama</a> in 2007. If you weren&#8217;t an Obama supporter beforehand this post may very well make you (Full Disclosure: I am an Obama supporter).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2008/03/03/barack-obama-marc-andreessen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Draft Lessig&#8230;.</title>
		<link>http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2008/02/17/draft-lessig/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2008/02/17/draft-lessig/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 13:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Constantine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2008/02/17/draft-lessig/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UPDATE: Lessig decided not to run&#8230;.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://draftlessig.org"><img src="http://draftlessig.org/outreach/draft-lessig-284x166.jpg" alt="draft lessig" style="border: 0;" /></a></p>
<p>UPDATE: Lessig decided not to run&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2008/02/17/draft-lessig/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama wins South Carolina!</title>
		<link>http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2008/01/27/341/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2008/01/27/341/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 15:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Constantine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2008/01/27/341/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A brilliant win in South Carolina by Barack Obama followed by another brilliant speech. As is readily apparent Obama&#8217;s oratory gifts are truly impressive. The first time I heard him speak I recall being stunned by Obama&#8217;s Audacity of Hope speech before the 2004 Democratic National Convention. I knew then that he would be destined [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><center><object width="425" height="373"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/-iVAPH_EcmQ&#038;rel=1&#038;border=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/-iVAPH_EcmQ&#038;rel=1&#038;border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="373"></embed></object></center><br />
A brilliant win in South Carolina by Barack Obama followed by another brilliant speech. As is readily apparent Obama&#8217;s oratory gifts are truly impressive. The first time I heard him speak I recall being stunned by Obama&#8217;s <a href="http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/convention2004/barackobama2004dnc.htm">Audacity of Hope</a> speech before the 2004 Democratic National Convention. I knew then that he would be destined for the White House and that I could potentially support him. Currently Barack seems like the most <strong>Presidential</strong> of the current crop of Dems as we slowly watch the Billary ticket implode. Even Bill Clinton is getting very bad press for his attacks on Obama.</p>
<p>The Republicans, on the other hand, are a total mess. Consumed by discussions of evolution vs. creationism (are they nuts?), inexplicable shifts in position (Rudy is suddenly anti Roe v Wade, wtf), McCain&#8217;s shift the the religious, and an evangelical Minister as a frontrunner (we need LESS not MORE religion). The only way this bunch of Republican yahoos could win the White House is if the Democrats destroy themselves in the primaries. Unfortunately I wouldn&#8217;t put self-destruction past the Dems as they have proven quite adept at that.</p>
<p>Back to Obama though, the other piece of news is <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caroline_Kennedy">Caroline Kennedy&#8217;s</a> brilliant endorsement in the New York Times titled <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/27/opinion/27kennedy.html?ex=1359090000&#038;en=6ffb34e6f28e176e&#038;ei=5124&#038;partner=permalink&#038;exprod=permalink">A President Like My Father</a>. I believe her endorsement may be the strongest endorsement a Kennedy has given to a candidate in recent times.</p>
<p>Barring any last minute entrants (Bloomberg?) Obama may be getting my vote&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2008/01/27/341/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stiglitz savages Bush&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2007/11/12/stiglitz-savages-bush/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2007/11/12/stiglitz-savages-bush/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 03:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Constantine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[currentaffairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2007/11/12/stiglitz-savages-bush/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Joe Stiglitz, Noble prize winning economist, savages Bush in a must read article over at Vanity Fair. In the article he predicts a generation long struggle for America to recoup its position in the world, not a pretty picture. Will the doomsayers win this time around? Or will the US pull off another remarkable recovery? [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_E._Stiglitz">Joe Stiglitz</a>, Noble prize winning economist, <a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2007/12/bush200712?printable=true">savages Bush</a> in a must read article over at Vanity Fair. In the article he predicts a generation long struggle for America to recoup its position in the world, not a pretty picture.<br />
Will the doomsayers win this time around? Or will the US pull off another remarkable recovery? Only time will tell&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2007/11/12/stiglitz-savages-bush/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scathing indictment&#8230;.</title>
		<link>http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2007/07/29/scathing-indictment/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2007/07/29/scathing-indictment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 00:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Constantine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[currentaffairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2007/07/29/scathing-indictment/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Walter Mondale, former Vice President to ex-President Jimmy Carter, has a must-read editorial in today&#8217;s Washington Post. Mondale details how he partnered with then President Carter to re-define the role of the Vice-Presidency, from backwater political office to the President&#8217;s closest and most trusted advisor. Carter &#038; Mondale&#8217;s re-definition continued through both Republican and Democratic [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Walter Mondale, former Vice President to ex-President Jimmy Carter, has a <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/27/AR2007072702126.html?hpid=opinionsbox2">must-read editorial in today&#8217;s Washington Post</a>. Mondale details how he partnered with then President Carter to re-define the role of the Vice-Presidency, from backwater political office to the President&#8217;s closest and most trusted advisor.</p>
<p>Carter &#038; Mondale&#8217;s re-definition continued through both Republican and Democratic Presidencies. Mondale argues that Dick Cheney has re-defined the office yet again. According to Mondale (&#038; I heartily agree), Cheney&#8217;s re-definition has taken the VP office in a disturbing direction, from trusted advisor to a powerful political office that attempts to actually limit the policy options presented to the President. </p>
<p>Yet another scathing examination of a Presidency in tatters. What will be the future ramifications of Cheney&#8217;s Vice Presidency? Who knows? The best possible outcome is that it is forgotten, a grimmer possibility is a permanent politicization of the office and for future Presidents the loss of another trusted objective voice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2007/07/29/scathing-indictment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Even more political bankruptcy&#8230;.</title>
		<link>http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2007/07/09/even-more-political-bankruptcy/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2007/07/09/even-more-political-bankruptcy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 20:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Constantine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2007/07/09/even-more-political-bankruptcy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is getting ridiculous]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/07/09/congress.bush/index.html">This is getting ridiculous</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2007/07/09/even-more-political-bankruptcy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ugh&#8230;.</title>
		<link>http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2007/07/03/ugh/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2007/07/03/ugh/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 11:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Constantine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2007/07/03/ugh/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Political Bankruptcy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/07/20070702-3.html">Political Bankruptcy</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2007/07/03/ugh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sicko&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2007/06/16/sicko/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2007/06/16/sicko/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2007 22:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Constantine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[currentaffairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2007/06/16/sicko/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently I had an opportunity to see Michael Moore&#8217;s latest titled Sicko. Sicko is a devastating indictment of the US healthcare system. In a work that evokes the great muckrakers of the past Moore tackles a deep and complex subject in a coarse, and at times, vulgar way. That shouldn&#8217;t be taken as an indictment [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently I had an opportunity to see Michael Moore&#8217;s latest titled <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sicko">Sicko</a>. Sicko is a devastating indictment of the US healthcare system. In a work that evokes the great muckrakers of the past Moore tackles a deep and complex subject in a coarse, and at times, vulgar way. That shouldn&#8217;t be taken as an indictment of the film or the message. Moore is quite effective at driving his point home, devastatingly so at times.</p>
<p>I am not a big fan of Moore&#8217;s work but Sicko is a profound moving movie with an effectively delivered and important message. American healthcare needs to be reformed and it needs to be reformed sooner rather than later. Hopefully our politicians will wake up and do something and if they don&#8217;t Sicko may wake up enough people to prompt some action. I highly recommend Sicko and I hope Moore stays out of politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2007/06/16/sicko/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Classic Moyers on the Iraq war&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2007/04/25/classic-moyers-on-the-iraq-war/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2007/04/25/classic-moyers-on-the-iraq-war/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2007 03:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Constantine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[currentaffairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2007/04/25/classic-moyers-on-the-iraq-war/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Buying the War&#8221; was finally broadcast last night and it may well be called Moyers&#8217; finest work ever. In &#8220;Buying the War&#8221; Moyers presents a sobering inside look at how nearly the entire journalist profession shirked its most basic tenets and became complicit in pushing the US into a war based almost entirely on lies. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Buying the War&#8221; was finally broadcast last night and it may well be called Moyers&#8217; finest work ever. In &#8220;Buying the War&#8221; Moyers presents a sobering inside look at how nearly the entire journalist profession shirked its most basic tenets and became complicit in pushing the US into a war based almost entirely on lies. </p>
<p>These are strong words coming from me, if you <a href="http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2003/04/07/saddam-dead/">peruse</a> some of <a href="http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2003/03/21/if-you-havent-read-dear/">my</a> <a href="http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2003/04/10/almost-there/">posts</a> from that time you will find that in general I was quite hawkish. (As an aside, how do I feel now? I was lied to, I was manipulated, I was used, so was my country, and our soldiers. The war should have never occurred and the administration did everything in its power to fool its own citizens. I am deeply pissed off and ashamed I didn&#8217;t question the party line more. I showed my wrath last election and will show it the next one as well.)</p>
<p>In any case, Bill Moyers &#8220;Buying the War&#8221; is a stunning first show for the new Bill Moyers Journal series on PBS. Its programs like this that make me glad I have a tv. <a href="http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/btw/watch.html">You can watch is online as well over at http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/btw/watch.html</a>.</p>
<p><!-- Technorati Tags Start --></p>
<p>Technorati Tags:<br />
<a href="http://technorati.com/tag/CurrentAffairs" rel="tag">CurrentAffairs</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/media" rel="tag">media</a>
</p>
<p><!-- Technorati Tags End --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2007/04/25/classic-moyers-on-the-iraq-war/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Barack Obama announces&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2007/01/16/barack-obama-announces/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2007/01/16/barack-obama-announces/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 22:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Constantine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2007/01/16/barack-obama-announces/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Barack Obama announces his &#34;Presidential Exploratory Comittee&#34; , the latest euphemism for he is running for President. I wish him well, I suspect we are in for a very bruising presidential election.&#160; Barack is an incredible guy, he is quite likeable and may give all comers a real run for their money. His life has [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.barackobama.com/"><img src="http://blog.spathis.com/wp-content/upload/2007/01/ZZ36F5C1C8.thumbnail.png" alt="Barack Obama" width="128" height="94" align="left" />Barack Obama announces his &quot;Presidential Exploratory Comittee&quot;</a> , the latest euphemism for he is running for President. I wish him well, I suspect we are in for a very bruising presidential election.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Barack is an incredible guy, he is quite likeable and may give all comers a real run for their money. His life has been a classic immigrant&#39;s tale of overcoming. Born to a white mother and a black immigrant father from Kenya, he epitomizes what is best in America. His embrace of the African-American experience will garner him support from the African American community (although there appears to be murmurs that the traditional African American leaders like Al Sharpton &amp; Jesse Jackson may not approve) and his championing of traditional American values will win him many white supporters (not to mention more than a few Republican defectors sick of the cesspool the party has become). Hopefully he will be able to live up to the ideals he frequently talks about, he has a real chance at changing the face of Washington.</p>
<p>Obama&#39;s oft mentioned weaknesses, his inexperience and youth, may also turn into his greatest strengths and allow him to differentiate himself from the typical calcified Washington political hack. If he is elected (or even if he wins the primary) it could signal the handover of power to a new generation, similar to Clinton&#39;s win in 1992. How different? Anyone&#39;s guess at this point, although honesty will hopefully play a big part (in a brilliant move Obama has publicly admitted to using cocaine in his teenage years to &quot;push questions of who I was out of my mind&quot;, how is that for honesty). Another similarity with Clinton is that they both have the ability to mesmerize an audience, Obama&#39;s keynote at the 2004 Democratic Convention was a superb example of that. It is absolutely critical that Obama use the momentum he now has to educate the people as to his plans for America, in particular Iraq &amp; the war on terror, and resist knee-jerk responses.</p>
<p> John Edwards has announced and now Obama has made the presidential race just a little more crowded. Lets hope they stick to the high road.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2007/01/16/barack-obama-announces/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Dems are in!</title>
		<link>http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2006/11/09/the-dems-are-in/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2006/11/09/the-dems-are-in/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 03:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Constantine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2006/11/09/the-dems-are-in/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A bruising election anyway you look at it. Viriginia and Montana went down to the very end. Hopefully we aren&#39;t going to have 2 years of deadlock at this point.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A bruising election anyway you look at it. Viriginia and Montana went down to  the very end. Hopefully we aren&#39;t going to have 2 years of deadlock at this point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2006/11/09/the-dems-are-in/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Your taxes at work&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2006/07/26/your-taxes-at-work/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2006/07/26/your-taxes-at-work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 11:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Constantine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2006/07/26/your-taxes-at-work/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why do we constantly hear that our public officials are out of touch? Good question, US Senator from Alaska Ted Stevens (R) gave a brilliant overview of the internet. Wired has a great piece here and the audio can be found here. These are our goverment officials who are supposed to foster innovation and help [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do we constantly hear that our public officials are out of touch? Good question, <a href="http://stevens.senate.gov/">US Senator from Alaska Ted Stevens (R)</a>  gave a <a href="http://blog.wired.com/27BStroke6/?entry_id=1512499">brilliant overview of the internet</a>. Wired has a great piece <a href="http://blog.wired.com/27BStroke6/index.blog?entry_id=1513010">here</a> and the audio can be found <a href="http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/497">here</a>.</p>
<p>These are our goverment officials who are supposed to foster innovation and help the US be a world leader in technology. Sorry, I&#39;m too busy laughing, tubes&#8230;&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2006/07/26/your-taxes-at-work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mahmood Ahmadi-Nejad letter to President Bush&#8230;.</title>
		<link>http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2006/05/10/mahmood-ahmadi-nejad-letter-to-president-bush/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2006/05/10/mahmood-ahmadi-nejad-letter-to-president-bush/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 14:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Constantine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[currentaffairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2006/05/10/mahmood-ahmadi-nejad-letter-to-president-bush/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fascinating reading over at: http://www.finalcall.com/artman/publish/article_2607.shtml]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fascinating reading over at: <a href="http://www.finalcall.com/artman/publish/article_2607.shtml">http://www.finalcall.com/artman/publish/article_2607.shtml</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2006/05/10/mahmood-ahmadi-nejad-letter-to-president-bush/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Iran and the state of the state&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2006/04/07/iran-and-the-state-of-the-state/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2006/04/07/iran-and-the-state-of-the-state/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2006 19:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Constantine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[currentaffairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2006/04/07/iran-and-the-state-of-the-state/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A fascinating little piece by Victor David Hanson, classicist and author of such works as Ripples of the Battle and A War Like No Other: How the Athenians and Spartans Fought the Peloponnesian War, over at the National Review. Hanson&#8217;s basic thesis is that Iran and Iran&#8217;s president (&#38; indeed many in the third world) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/hanson/hanson200604070923.asp">A fascinating little piece</a> by Victor David Hanson, classicist and author of such works as <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0385504004/ref=nosim/103-7204673-5379048?n=283155"><strong>Ripples of the Battle</strong></a> and <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1400060958/ref=nosim/103-7204673-5379048?n=283155"><strong>A War Like No Other: How the Athenians and Spartans Fought the Peloponnesian War</strong></a>, over at the <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/"><strong>National Review</strong></a>. Hanson&#8217;s basic thesis is that Iran and Iran&#8217;s president (&amp; indeed many in the third world) fundamentally miscalculate the ability of the west (&amp; the US in particular) to rise and meet the challenge posed by those who dare to cross the line. Hanson writes:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Ever since September 11, the subtext of this war could be summed up as something like, “Suburban Jason, with his iPod, godlessness, and earring, loves to live too much to die, while Ali, raised as the 11th son of an impoverished but devout street-sweeper in Damascus, loves death too much to live.” The Iranians, like bin Laden, promulgate this mythical antithesis, which, like all caricatures, has elements of truth in it. But what the Iranians, like the al Qaedists, do not fully fathom, is that Jason, upon concluding that he would lose not only his iPod and earring, but his entire family and suburb as well, is capable of conjuring up things far more frightening than anything in the 8th-century brain of Mr. Ahmadinejad. Unfortunately, the barbarity of the nightmares at Antietam, Verdun, Dresden, and Hiroshima prove that well enough.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I simply love that paragraph. Read it again and digest what it says. Look at history, during the last century far too many barbaric brutal dictators made the same mistake and miscalculated the ability of the west to meet the challenge. For all our problems I don&#8217;t believe the west has anything to fear, we are inevitably sliding into a world where many more billions are going to be tormented by trying to decide which iPod to buy. And if you ask me that is far better than any alternative offered by any petty third world dictator.</p>
<p style="color:#008;text-align:right;"><small><em>Powered by</em> <a href="http://www.qumana.com/">Qumana</a></small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2006/04/07/iran-and-the-state-of-the-state/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>World of Warcraft &amp; China&#8230;.</title>
		<link>http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2006/03/28/world-of-warcraft-china/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2006/03/28/world-of-warcraft-china/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 01:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Constantine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2006/03/28/world-of-warcraft-china/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is amazing, China just doesn&#39;t miss a beat.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/14.04/law.html">This is amazing</a>, China just doesn&#39;t miss a beat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.spathis.com/archives/2006/03/28/world-of-warcraft-china/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

